OneStopGate.Com
OnestopGate   OnestopGate
   Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Login  
OnestopGate
Home | Overview | Syllabus | Tutorials | FAQs | Downloads | Recommended Websites | Advertise | Payments | Contact Us | Forum
OneStopGate

GATE Resources
Gate Articles
Gate Books
Gate Colleges 
Gate Downloads 
Gate Faqs
Gate Jobs
Gate News 
Gate Sample Papers
Training Institutes

GATE Overview
Overview
GATE Eligibility
Structure Of GATE
GATE Coaching Centers
Colleges Providing M.Tech/M.E.
GATE Score
GATE Results
PG with Scholarships
Article On GATE
Admission Process For M.Tech/ MCP-PhD
GATE Topper 2012-13
GATE Forum




GATE 2025 Exclusive
Organizing Institute
Important Dates
How to Apply
Discipline Codes
GATE 2025 Exam Structure

GATE 2025 Syllabus
Aerospace Engg..
Agricultural Engg..
Architecture and Planning
Chemical Engg..
Chemistry
Civil Engg..
Computer Science / IT
Electronics & Communication Engg..
Electrical Engg..
Engineering Sciences
Geology and Geophysics
Instrumentation Engineering
Life Sciences
Mathematics
Mechanical Engg..
Metallurgical Engg..
Mining Engg..
Physics
Production & Industrial Engg..
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Textile Engineering and Fibre Science

GATE Study Material
Aerospace Engg..
Agricultural Engg..
Chemical Engg..
Chemistry
Civil Engg..
Computer Science / IT
Electronics & Communication Engg..
Electrical Engg..
Engineering Sciences
Instrumentation Engg..
Life Sciences
Mathematics
Mechanical Engg..
Physics
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Textile Engineering  and Fibre Science

GATE Preparation
GATE Pattern
GATE Tips N Tricks
Compare Evaluation
Sample Papers 
Gate Downloads 
Experts View

CEED 2013
CEED Exams
Eligibility
Application Forms
Important Dates
Contact Address
Examination Centres
CEED Sample Papers

Discuss GATE
GATE Forum
Exam Cities
Contact Details
Bank Details

Miscellaneous
Advertisment
Contact Us


Home » GATE Study Material » Electronics and Telecommunications » Radio History » History of the Radio Receiver

History of the Radio Receiver

Looking for GATE Preparation Material? Join & Get here now!

** Gate 2013 Question Papers.. ** CEED 2013 Results.. ** Gate 2013 Question Papers With Solutions.. ** GATE 2013 CUT-OFFs.. ** GATE 2013 Results.. **

History of the Radio Receiver

History of the Radio Receiver

The radio receiver has undergone considerable development since the first radio signals were received. Today there is a great interest in vintage radio receivers, valve technology and the way in which radio has developed since the earliest days of wireless.

In 1895 Marconi demonstrated the first viable radio system, now over 100 years later the radios that are in use today bear no resemblance to the early equipment that was used. The equipment that was used in the 19th Century was crude and very insensitive, nowadays receivers are very sensitive and they offer many facilities. They are also used in a wide variety of applications from broadcast reception, through cellular telecommunications to satellite links and much more. To be able to operate in all these diverse areas, receiver technology has changed beyond all recognition. These developments represent the work of many people from the earliest days of wireless right up to the modern day. Some of these people have their names entered the technology history books, but the majority were just ordinary engineers or radio enthusiasts who remain unknown.


Wireless beginnings


The story behind the development of the radio receiver begins with the discovery of radio waves themselves. A brilliant Scot named Maxwell was the first person to prove electromagnetic waves existed. However he only showed this mathematically and he was never able to demonstrate them in a practical form. Although many people stumbled across them and demonstrated effects that now we know were radio waves, it was a German named Heinrich Hertz who knowingly demonstrated these new waves which Maxwell had proved existed. He used some spark gap equipment to transmit and receive radio or Hertzian waves as they were first called.

Hertz used a number of variations of the basic equipment. Essentially the transmitter consisted of a circuit in which a spark was made to jump across a gap. A second circuit with similar dimensions but with a smaller gap was placed within a metre or so of the first circuit. When a spark was made to jump across the gap in the transmitter circuit, a smaller but simultaneous spark would be seen to jump across the gap in the second.

Naturally the range of this arrangement was very limited, mainly because the receiving circuit had to pick up a large amount of energy for the spark to jump across the gap.

Coherers


It was soon realised that more sophisticated and sensitive methods of detecting radio waves were needed. A device called a coherer became the basis for reception, and remained in widespread use for about ten years. The coherer is based around the effect that had been known since the 1850s that small particles of dust or even metal filings stick together or cohere when an electric field is present.

The first person to use the phenomenon to detect radio waves was a Frenchman named Edouard Branly. He discovered that the resistance of a glass tube filled with metal filings fell from a few megohms to a few hundred ohms when placed close to a discharge. A short mechanical shock then restored the coherer to it high resistance state.

Once Branly had developed the basic idea, Oliver Lodge popularised it when he gave a lecture in 1898 in honour of Hertz who had recently died.. Lodge also made improvements to the device. Usually the coherer was made to operate a bell so that when a spark or discharge took place the bell rang. A self-restoring feature was also introduced. The current flowing through the coherer was made to operate a small tapper that restored the coherer as well as ringing the bell. This meant at it was ready for the next discharge almost immediately.

Guglielmo Marconi


It was possibly Marconi who did more for the new technology of radio than any other person, especially in its early days. He believed that these new waves could be used to communicate over great distances. He also undertook many experiments and steadily improved the distances over which signals could be detected. He looked at the coherer and had his assistant spend many hours experiment with different materials to find the best combinations, and in this way he made some significant improvements.

As an indication of the way in which his developments were progressing he managed to span the Bristol Channel, and later he managed to send a message across the English Channel. During this experiment the signals were picked up at his factory in Chelmsford. This was considerably further than anyone had expected the signals could travel, and it made Marconi think that it would be possible to span the Atlantic.

Although Marconi's company did not have the funds to support a venture of this size, undeterred he set about the task, building stations in Britain and America and after many difficulties he managed to make contact in December 1901. This was an enormous achievement and it made headlines in the newspapers, but the sensitivity of the receiver proved to be the limiting factor. This set Ambrose Fleming, professor at University College London and consultant to Marconi thinking about the ways in which improvements could be made.

Fleming's Valve


The idea for this next development in receiver technology found its origins with Edison in America. He had been investigating the reasons for the short life of light bulbs. After a short while the inside of the bulbs became blackened and he could not find a way to prevent this. It was thought that carbon from the filament was coating the inside of the glass. In one experiment to overcome the problem he placed a second wire or electrode into the bulb and noticed that current would flow between the electrodes if the negative end of a battery was connected to the heater filament and the positive end to the additional electrode. He also noticed if the battery was reversed, then no current flowed.

Surprisingly, Edison could not find a use for this interesting phenomenon. Fleming who had seen the effect demonstrated by Edison wondered if it could be used to detect radio waves. He set his assistant to set up an experiment to discover if it could be used, and to their delight it did. He called it his oscillation valve because it acted in the same way as water valve in only allowing flow in one direction.

The idea behind Fleming's Oscillation Valve

Crystal detectors


While Fleming's valve was a great stride forward it would take some years before thermionic technology was fully adopted. One of the reasons for this is that it was expensive to manufacture and to run. It could only be powered by batteries when used as a radio detector and batteries did not last for long because of the power required by the filament. Batteries were also very expensive as they had not been developed as much as they have been today.

Around this time work on other types of detectors started to be undertaken and it resulted in what was later known as the cat's whisker. It consisted of a crystal of a material such as galena with a small springy piece of wire brought up against it. The detector was constructed to that the wire contact could be moved to different points on the crystal, and thereby obtain the best point for rectifying the signal and the best detection.

These detectors soon gained the name cat's whiskers as a result of their construction. They were never very reliable and the whisker needed to be moved periodically to enable it to detect the signal properly. However they were very much cheaper than valves and gained widespread acceptance.

It is interesting to note that the cat's whisker was the first semiconductor device. The materials that were used were semiconductors, and cat's whisker formed a very crude point contact diode.

Triodes


Despite the success of the cat's whisker, work did not stop on the development of thermionic technology. An American named Lee de Forest was a competitor to Marconi and needed to develop receiver technology that did not infringe any patents to which Marconi had access. To achieve this he devoted a large amount of time in developing a thermionic detector which did not infringe Fleming's patents. He took out a number of patents in the period between 1905 and 1907 covering a variety of developments that culminated in the form of the triode valve in which there was a third electrode called a grid. He called this tube an Audion. With the benefit of hindsight it seems amazing that the Audion was initially used as a leaky grid detector and it took until 1911 for it to be used as an amplifier. Once this fact had been discovered many people were quick to exploit this fact in a variety of applications. One of the first areas in which valves were used was in the manufacture of telephone repeaters, and although the performance was poor, they gave significant improvement in long distance telephone circuits.

With the discovery that triode valves could amplify signals it was soon noticed that they would also oscillate. This was a mixed blessing. It was a great disadvantage because these early valves were very difficult to stabilise when used for signals above a few kilohertz. However the fact that valves could be used as oscillators was exploited in generating signals. Previously high frequency signals had been difficult to generate. If steady signals were required, electromechanical techniques had to be used, and these had obvious frequency limitations. With the use of valves it was possible to make relatively compact electronic oscillators.

TRF Receivers
Once the triode was established as an amplifier it made a tremendous difference to radio receiver performance as it allowed the incoming signals to be amplified. Previously most sets used crystal detectors and even with a large aerial, the signal levels were low. The introduction of the triode valve enabled signals to be amplified so that more distant or weaker stations could be heard. However in virtually all cases the valve was sued as an audio amplifier because of the stability problems with these early devices.

To be able to achieve sufficient gain, more than one valve was needed, and as their cost was very high, people looked at making the most efficient use of them. One way that proved very successful was introduced in 1913 and involved the use of positive feedback in the form of a regenerative detector. This gave significant improvements in the levels of gain that could be achieved. The idea

These regenerative receivers proved to be very successful. The amount of feedback could be adjusted to the point of oscillation, and this greatly increased the gain and selectivity, enabling this type of receiver to out-perform all other forms.

War developments


With the outbreak of the First World War, there was a great impetus to develop wireless technology further. Both sides of the conflict recognised the benefits it could bring, both in terms of improved communication and intelligence. One of the first areas on which development activity was focused was the valve itself. In these early days of thermionic technology their performance was poor. They lacked gain, especially at high frequencies and they were prone to oscillate when they were used at frequencies anything above a few kilohertz.

Originally it was thought that small amount of gas in the envelope was key to their operation. However an American named Langmuir disproved this and as a result a new generation totally evacuated "hard" valves were introduced. Not only was the operation of valves improved by the complete evacuation, but it also allowed the heaters to have coatings applied to them to improve their emission. In the old "soft" valves the gasses in the envelope contaminated the coatings making them unusable.

The other problem with valves was their susceptibility to oscillation. One of the main reasons for this was the level of capacitance between the grid and anode. A number of attempts were made to reduce this. H.J. Round undertook some work on this and in 1916 he produced a number valves with the grid connection taken out of the top of the envelope away from the anode connection. This proved to give a major improvement, but the final solution did not come until the 1920s.

Although the TRF receiver represented a major improvement in performance over what had been available before, it still fell short of the needs for some of the new applications. To enable receiver technology to meet the needs placed upon it a number of new ideas started to surface.

One of these was a new form of direct conversion receiver. Here an internal or local oscillator was used to beat with the incoming signal to produce and audible signal that could be amplified by an audio amplifier. Although the basic principle of the direct conversion had been known about for many years many considered the system was wasteful of valves because the oscillator and mixer did not contribute to the gain of the set. Even in military circles this was a consideration because of the size and cost of the valves and their associated batteries.

The problem was solved by one of Britain's leading wireless engineers, a man named H J Round. He developed a receiver he called an autodyne in which the same valve was used as a mixer and an oscillator, Whilst the set used fewer valves it was difficult to optimise the circuit for both the mixer and oscillator functions. To make the next leap forward in receiver technology a new type of set was needed.

The superhet


To solve the problem a new type of receiver known as the superhet, or supersonic heterodyne receiver was developed. The first step in this development was taken by a Frenchman named Lucien Levy. He was investigating ways in which receiver selectivity could be improved and in doing this he devised a system whereby the signals were converted down to a lower frequency where the filter bandwidths could be made narrower. A further advantage was that the gain of valves was considerably greater at the lower frequencies after used after the frequency conversion, and there were fewer problems with the circuits bursting into oscillation. The idea was very successful, and even though it did not totally eliminate interference as Levy had hoped it was a considerable improvement over previous receivers. However it was not the superhet of today because his receiver still retained the idea of a variable frequency filter, even though it was at a lower intermediate frequency.

The idea for developing a receiver with a fixed intermediate frequency amplifier and filter is credited to Edwin Armstrong. Working for the American Expeditionary Force in Europe, Armstrong thought that if the incoming signals were mixed with a variable frequency oscillator, a low frequency fix tuned amplifier could be used. Like Levy's idea this would enable the valves to operate at a lower frequency where they would be more efficient. It also meant that a fix tuned amplifier could be used and this would be capable of providing much greater degrees of selectivity than a variable one. This is because several stages could be cascaded relatively easily and the tuning preset before use.

Armstrong's original receiver consisted of a total of eight valves. In the set the signal was converted from its incoming frequency down to a fixed intermediate frequency stage. By altering the frequency of the local oscillator the frequency of the received signal was changed. The low intermediate frequency stage allowed greater levels of gain, as in the case of Levy's set because the low frequencies allowed greater levels of gain and stability. Also having a fixed frequency intermediate stage allowed the filters to be more selective. Several tuned circuits could be cascaded to improve selectivity, and being on a fixed frequency they did not all need to be changed in line with one another. The filters could be preset and left correctly tuned.

The new superhet gave an impressive performance, but its development came at the end of the war. With its use of a large number of valves it was only viable for use in specialist applications, many of which were no longer required after the cessation of hostilities. Accordingly Armstrong's discovery was rarely used for a number of years. Interestingly, Armstrong was not the only person working on the idea of a superhet. Meissner in Germany took out a patent for the idea six months before Armstrong, but as Meissner did not prove the idea in practice and did not build a superhet radio, the idea is credited to Armstrong.

Superhet gains acceptance


It took many years before the superhet was widely used. In the early 1920s there were few stations that could be heard and the superior performance of the superhet was not required, especially at the considerable cost of all the valves that were used. However as the 1920s passed more stations came on the air, especially in America and the need for the selectivity provided by the superhet became more apparent. As a result the superhet started to be used. A number of developments in valve technology also helped. Originally all valves were directly heated, and this meant that each valve required a separate filament supply. The introduction of the indirectly heated valve meant that an alternating supply could be used. This was because the heaters different connection to the cathode. This allowed the bias conditions to be fulfilled even if the filaments were connected in series or parallel with one another.



Discussion Center

Discuss/
Query

Papers/
Syllabus

Feedback/
Suggestion

Yahoo
Groups

Sirfdosti
Groups

Contact
Us

MEMBERS LOGIN
  
Email ID:
Password:

  Forgot Password?
 New User? Register!

INTERVIEW EBOOK
Get 9,000+ Interview Questions & Answers in an eBook. Interview Question & Answer Guide
  • 9,000+ Interview Questions
  • All Questions Answered
  • 5 FREE Bonuses
  • Free Upgrades
GATE RESOURCES
 
  • Gate Books
  • Training Institutes
  • Gate FAQs
  • GATE BOOKS
     
  • Mechanical Engineeering Books
  • Robotics Automations Engineering Books
  • Civil Engineering Books
  • Chemical Engineering Books
  • Environmental Engineering Books
  • Electrical Engineering Books
  • Electronics Engineering Books
  • Information Technology Books
  • Software Engineering Books
  • GATE Preparation Books
  • Exciting Offers



    GATE Exam, Gate 2009, Gate Papers, Gate Preparation & Related Pages


    GATE Overview | GATE Eligibility | Structure Of GATE | GATE Training Institutes | Colleges Providing M.Tech/M.E. | GATE Score | GATE Results | PG with Scholarships | Article On GATE | GATE Forum | GATE 2009 Exclusive | GATE 2009 Syllabus | GATE Organizing Institute | Important Dates for GATE Exam | How to Apply for GATE | Discipline / Branch Codes | GATE Syllabus for Aerospace Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Agricultural Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Architecture and Planning | GATE Syllabus for Chemical Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Chemistry | GATE Syllabus for Civil Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Computer Science / IT | GATE Syllabus for Electronics and Communication Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Engineering Sciences | GATE Syllabus for Geology and Geophysics | GATE Syllabus for Instrumentation Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Life Sciences | GATE Syllabus for Mathematics | GATE Syllabus for Mechanical Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Metallurgical Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Mining Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Physics | GATE Syllabus for Production and Industrial Engineering | GATE Syllabus for Pharmaceutical Sciences | GATE Syllabus for Textile Engineering and Fibre Science | GATE Preparation | GATE Pattern | GATE Tips & Tricks | GATE Compare Evaluation | GATE Sample Papers | GATE Downloads | Experts View on GATE | CEED 2009 | CEED 2009 Exam | Eligibility for CEED Exam | Application forms of CEED Exam | Important Dates of CEED Exam | Contact Address for CEED Exam | CEED Examination Centres | CEED Sample Papers | Discuss GATE | GATE Forum of OneStopGATE.com | GATE Exam Cities | Contact Details for GATE | Bank Details for GATE | GATE Miscellaneous Info | GATE FAQs | Advertisement on GATE | Contact Us on OneStopGATE |
    Copyright © 2024. One Stop Gate.com. All rights reserved Testimonials |Link To Us |Sitemap |Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions|About Us
    Our Portals : Academic Tutorials | Best eBooksworld | Beyond Stats | City Details | Interview Questions | India Job Forum | Excellent Mobiles | Free Bangalore | Give Me The Code | Gog Logo | Free Classifieds | Jobs Assist | Interview Questions | One Stop FAQs | One Stop GATE | One Stop GRE | One Stop IAS | One Stop MBA | One Stop SAP | One Stop Testing | Web Hosting | Quick Site Kit | Sirf Dosti | Source Codes World | Tasty Food | Tech Archive | Software Testing Interview Questions | Free Online Exams | The Galz | Top Masala | Vyom | Vyom eBooks | Vyom International | Vyom Links | Vyoms | Vyom World
    C Interview Questions | C++ Interview Questions | Send Free SMS | Placement Papers | SMS Jokes | Cool Forwards | Romantic Shayari